VGC portal talked with two bosses Platinumgames – President Atsusi Inaba (Atsushi Inaba) and vice president Hideki Kamiya (Hideki kamiya). Among the conversations were NFT, but the studio in them is not yet interested – in her opinion, now there are not enough value for creators and players.
Inaba Specked as follows:
We did not hesitate to nFT too tight. I understand that the topic is fashionable and is gaining momentum, but it is gaining momentum due to financial benefits for companies. But for creators and users there is nothing good there. Therefore, the topic looks unpleasant.
People who promote NFT and try to cooperate with game companies usually impose a very unilateral conversation: “Hey, you will earn a lot of money!". But what is the benefit for the user or creator? If I want to spend on something time, it should be useful in creating good games.
Content is increasingly going into the “figure”, so I think NFT as a concept will become more important. But the early adherents see in it just a way to earn more. Honestly, I am not interested in participating in this.
Then the VGC interviewer asked another question: “You were surprised how fast Konami I contacted NFT?" Kamia answered straightforwardly:
Yes, not that. If it smells of money somewhere, then Konami It’s right there!
Honestly, I have no interest in this topic. I think what I said Inaba, – This is just about me, since in my soul I am more a user than a businessman. And for users in NFT there is no benefit now. In the future, if the topic expands and gives users something positive, then maybe I will be interested in what can be done there. But now there is nothing like that.
In the interview, the following was also mentioned:
Kamia I was surprised at how his recent statements about the desire to resurrect and resurrected Scalebound . He claims that he regularly talked about this after the abolition of the game. Kamia He emphasized once again: this is not a joke, he really wants to work on again Scalebound.
Platinumgames announced that she was interested in services-services. In fresh material Inaba I turned the thought slightly: this does not mean that the studio will no longer make games in the spirit of its previous creations-if there is a great idea for a completely single action, then they will not abandon it.
Bayonetta 3 will not necessarily be the last game of the series. If fans continue to express interest in Bayonetta, then it will develop further. However, herself Platinumgames cannot promise something: she does not own the rights to the franchise and in this sense depends on the decision of the publishers.
February 17, 2022 Metro circulation: Exodus exceeded six million copies
February 17, 2022 developers No Man’s Sky: "We have not finished even close to the game"
The best comments
Sobsna, Kamia, as always! Stupidly handsome man!
Thanks to the cap. But I am glad that there is more and more rejection to NFT
Platinumgames: “NFT is money for companies, but without benefit for creators or players
It’s not just money. This is almost fraud.
A correctly made game-service can quite be profitable for all sides.
There they will give you creativity to https://grandbay-casino.co.uk/login/ work out, and the player is a normal game and content with adequate monetization, and loot with a river.
Well, and according to the manner of your spelling, it seems that you quoted it and on the basis of this statement you ask about Gachahs.
I don’t know a single such game. There are examples?
Warframe, Team Fortress 2.
APEX places.
Overwatch was excellent at the exit, but this is an example of how to get out of the candy into a bad result, although they had a card blanche.
Yes Fortnite is banal.
Just come on we will immediately designate that “I don’t like” not = bad.
Yeah, creativity, well, well. You will work on one game for years, sticking a variety of monetization there. What creativity can we talk about in games?
Well, that’s why you cannot imagine such a game, you are not a creative person, to see, higher examples where creativity found a place and monetization.
NFT implies the use of the capacities of all voluntary and not very participants in this carnival. For many tens of thousands of thousands (in the case of a popular platform), computers are made that the file with such an article belongs to that Chelik (the possession does not apply to the banal copies and screenshots). All this with constant recalculations and rewriting. Right! Let’s just fade the power of the computers, but the Creanter’s office can save on the server (in fact, even this will not, the picture needs to be kept somewhere fully). After all, there is no crisis of semiconductors, in any stall you can buy vidyuhu on the building from the package with seeds.
Well, you don’t, others yes. All in the world taste.
The fact that you do not play services-services do not mean that there are no good games-services. I do not play strategy, but I can’t say that there are no good strategies. I can’t go through the plot single games alone, I need to dilute them with less exciting things. Plus, with age and children, the majority do not have so much time to sit down and stick into a witcher, RDR and other games for 150+ hours.
Dying Light can also be considered a game-service with a bunch of various cosmetics that you buy separately, temporary events, PVP, even royal battle times, etc.D. Bad game?
Division (especially the first) excellent service game, it is unfortunate that it is impossible to assemble a group today in survival on PS.
Warframe, Payday 2, and a bunch of different other good games-services exists for people, not like you.
All games services are designed to retain and involve the player, which turns the gameplay into daily routine and second work (these are all the battles and seasons)
You throw off a photo in a yellow dress in the comments if you are held in the basement and forced to knock out Batlpass in Apex.
I can understand if you are a streamer, and you need to knock out clothes, ranks and so on to keep and attract an audience, but in other cases you can not do this and just enjoy the process as much as you need without paying a penny. Nobody can make you buy skins. It seems to be obvious.
I played and played, but I do not consider such a model for the distribution of games good.
Then why are you playing if you say that there are no good games?
You can also add the final line 14 and the Second World War from the time of its launch to 2010-2012 (of course, right now it is below the skirting board).
Instead of parasitus on it. Is it really bad ?
I don’t know a single such game. There are examples?
Fortnite, Apex, Hunt. In any case, from what I played. Although I not so long ago joined Hunt (as soon as the bow was added, instantly paid), and there the content apparently updated for a long time, but I still enjoy a couple of skating rinks once a week. And hunters with weapons are not straight for such a lot of money, especially at a discount.
Everything is in the apex with the creativity of norms and monetization, and the fan. A lot of chips brought to modern batteri. Content and events often pass. Everyone is happy. Once every six months after some next cartoon I return for a couple of weeks.
I generally consider the window as the ideal of working with players. I didn’t play a lot in it, since it is not convenient for me to build from the gamepad, but every time some collab with Marvel and the like begins, I just want to break through.
It remains only for the Blessed Kodzhumbich to speak about NFT and you can sleep calmly
Services games are money for companies, but without benefit for creators or players 🙂
Where he said this, be kind.
It’s just that it is PR, and many in the comments led to him, and I am a buuger from this
The fact that you do not play services-services do not mean that there are no good games-services.
I played and played, but I do not consider such a model for the distribution of games good. All games services are designed to retain and involve the player, which turns the gameplay into daily routine and second work (these are all the battles and seasons)
Just come on we will immediately designate that “I don’t like” not = bad.
And "I like" = good?
All the games you have listed are still created to generate dough with their endless battles with passes, season, temporary euchents and other things “Play quickly, otherwise you will not have time”. I don’t see anything good about it.
Well, that’s why you cannot imagine such a game, you are not a creative person, to see, higher examples where creativity found a place and monetization.
Keep in the know. Those who work on a phonete work on wear, because you need to have time to release a new pack of content for sale. It doesn’t even smell like creativity there. There is clean water business.
Team Fortress 2 generally about hats, not about the game.
Overwatch is what appeared on the corpse of Titan, when creativity turned out to be too long and costly. As a result, a typical project appeared with skinchiks and lutboxes.
Services games are money for companies, but without benefit for creators or players 🙂
Interesting, how does he also feel about the gachs of games.
And I wrote that he said this somewhere? I wrote this to the fact that the services-services are created exclusively to generate dough, and platinums are interested in games.
And the essence of the economic basis it exists is not fraud?